Published on January 28th, 2015 | by Roger Chu
Pentagon Submits Acquisition Reform Ideas to Congress
The Pentagon’s top acquisition official submitted legislative proposals to the House Armed Services Committee on Jan. 28 aimed at simplifying what practitioners and observers say is an overly complex acquisition process.
The hearing was the opening salvo in a debate the 114th Congress is likely to have over how to halt erosion of the United States’ advantage in defense technology relative to its adversaries.
The legislative suggestions include reducing documentation, clarifying the role of Milestone Decision Authorities, simplifying rules for supporting an acquisition program throughout its life cycle, and defining the roles of two Pentagon offices in overseeing business systems.
The proposals came from Frank Kendall, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, who warned the committee about the potential for the Defense Department’s bureaucracy to slow the deployment of technology to meet new threats.
In managing an acquisition contract, “the rules our program managers must follow are still too complicated and burdensome,” he said. “We need the flexibility to tailor our contracts consistent with all of the various types of situations that we face.”
The proposals are part of a much broader initiative Kendall is leading to make an often byzantine acquisition process more responsive to the Pentagon’s weapons and IT needs. In September, he unveiled a draft of Better Buying Power 3.0, which seeks to keep acquisition costs down by fostering more competition. A spokesperson for Kendall said the final version of that guidance will be issued in mid-February.
Full article by Sean Lyngaas, FCW